Tuesday 24 November 2015

Busan 2nd Forum; any hope for national level implementation?

MacDonald Munyoro of NAYO making a presentation @Busan Forum in South Korea

The 2nd Busan Global Partnership Forum 2015 has started in South Korea; running from the 23rd -24th of November. The forum gathers together 200 delegates drawn from governments, the private sector and broader Civil Society organizations.
The journey from Aid Effectiveness to Development Effectiveness has been a series of High Level Meetings in which both donor and recipients crafted concrete solutions for sustainable development.

The Development Effectiveness trajectory got a momentum in 2002 when there was Monterrey Consensus on Finance for Development which underscored the need to access the quality of Official Development Assistance (ODA) as well as increase volume.

Persistent dissatisfaction with Aid performance has led to a series of other High Level Meetings (HLMs) in Rome 2003(Declaration on Harmonization), Paris 2005-the Declaration on Aid Effectiveness, Accra Agenda for Action in 2008, Dili Declaration on Fragile States in 2010, Bogota Statement on South to South Cooperation (SSC) in 2010, Busan High Level Meeting in 2011, the Global Partnership in 2012 among other key meetings.

The key objectives of the 2015 Busan  Annual Forum is     to review progress in implementing the principles and commitments at country level, sharing critical reflections and putting forward recommendations to Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (GPEDC )’s bi-annual HLMs and Global Monitoring Reports,   to promote a clear, shared understanding of GPEDC’s contribution to the post-2015 development agenda and provide an opportunity for country-level stakeholders to feedback and engage on this agenda   and to provide a forum for GPEDC stakeholders beyond the Steering Committee to contribute to its work by sharing their ideas and practical experience  with each other.

The 2015 Forum will be the first GPEDC meeting to take place after the UN Sustainable Development Summit – as such key themes have been identified as priorities for the 2015 Forum. These include:
·         The role of GPEDC and its contribution to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development    
·          The role of the private sector in development effectiveness   and
·           Development effectiveness in states of fragility.

The Forum will also feature side meetings on Climate Financing, South to South Cooperation, Financing for Results and the role of CSO’s in Development Effectiveness. 

As part of this meeting, several institutions are attending and from Civil Society there are Global organizations such as CSO Partnership for Development Effectiveness (CPDE), the youth are also represented by National Association of Youth Organizations (NAYO Zimbabwe) which is the CPDE Global Youth Sector Coordinator and NAYO will make a presentation on, “Engaging the 'torch-bearers' - youth footprints on the Busan Agenda. The topic focuses on the Busan principle of Inclusive Development Partnerships – this based on regional and national experiences of youth. 

The main question is how Busan Principles are being implemented at national level in different countries. In doing so, it is important to take into account the principle of inclusive ownership, with all actors involved in development. The governments should harmonize their policies; consult the stakeholders in putting up and consolidating the development agenda with all stakeholders such as Youth, Women, Private sector, CSOs, development partners, among other being involved.

Many stakeholders are calling for harmonization of all developmental tools, to speak the same language depending on regional and national context. Zimbabwe included; there is need to see how Busan outcomes can be linked to the policy document Zim-ASSET.

Let’s Wait and See!
Misheck Gondo

Misheck is an International Relations Expert and a Policy Advocate


Thursday 24 September 2015

Pope Francis makes historic address to U.S. Congress

(Vatican Radio)  Pope Francis on Thursday (24th September) made history by becoming the first Pope ever to address a joint session of the United States Congress. In his wide-ranging address that was frequently interrupted by applause, the Pope touched on many themes including the need for politics to serve the common good, the importance of cooperation and solidarity, the dangers of fundamentalism, the refugee crisis, abolition of the death penalty, the need for courageous acts to avert environmental deterioration, the evils of the arms trade and threats to the family from within and without. During his speech he also mentioned four great Americans from the past, Abraham Lincoln, Martin Luther King, Dorothy Day and Thomas Merton, saying that each of them helped build a better future for the people of the U.S.

 Find below the full text of Pope Francis’ address to the Joint Session of the United States Congress 

Mr. Vice-President,
Mr. Speaker,
Honorable Members of Congress,
Dear Friends,
                I am most grateful for your invitation to address this Joint Session of Congress in “the land of the free and the home of the brave”.  I would like to think that the reason for this is that I too am a son of this great continent, from which we have all received so much and toward which we share a common responsibility.
                Each son or daughter of a given country has a mission, a personal and social responsibility. Your own responsibility as members of Congress is to enable this country, by your legislative activity, to grow as a nation.  You are the face of its people, their representatives.  You are called to defend and preserve the dignity of your fellow citizens in the tireless and demanding pursuit of the common good, for this is the chief aim of all politics.  A political society endures when it seeks, as a vocation, to satisfy common needs by stimulating the growth of all its members, especially those in situations of greater vulnerability or risk. Legislative activity is always based on care for the people.  To this you have been invited, called and convened by those who elected you.
                Yours is a work which makes me reflect in two ways on the figure of Moses.  On the one hand, the patriarch and lawgiver of the people of Israel symbolizes the need of peoples to keep alive their sense of unity by means of just legislation.  On the other, the figure of Moses leads us directly to God and thus to the transcendent dignity of the human being.  Moses provides us with a good synthesis of your work: you are asked to protect, by means of the law, the image and likeness fashioned by God on every human face.
                Today I would like not only to address you, but through you the entire people of the United States. Here, together with their representatives, I would like to take this opportunity to dialogue with the many thousands of men and women who strive each day to do an honest day’s work, to bring home their daily bread, to save money and –one step at a time – to build a better life for their families.  These are men and women who are not concerned simply with paying their taxes, but in their own quiet way sustain the life of society.  They generate solidarity by their actions, and they create organizations which offer a helping hand to those most in need. 
                I would also like to enter into dialogue with the many elderly persons who are a storehouse of wisdom forged by experience, and who seek in many ways, especially through volunteer work, to share their stories and their insights.  I know that many of them are retired, but still active; they keep working to build up this land.  I also want to dialogue with all those young people who are working to realize their great and noble aspirations, who are not led astray by facile proposals, and who face difficult situations, often as a result of immaturity on the part of many adults.  I wish to dialogue with all of you, and I would like to do so through the historical memory of your people.
                My visit takes place at a time when men and women of good will are marking the anniversaries of several great Americans.  The complexities of history and the reality of human weakness notwithstanding, these men and women, for all their many differences and limitations, were able by hard work and self-sacrifice – some at the cost of their lives – to build a better future.  They shaped fundamental values which will endure forever in the spirit of the American people.  A people with this spirit can live through many crises, tensions and conflicts, while always finding the resources to move forward, and to do so with dignity.   These men and women offer us a way of seeing and interpreting reality.  In honoring their memory, we are inspired, even amid conflicts, and in the here and now of each day, to draw upon our deepest cultural reserves.
                I would like to mention four of these Americans: Abraham Lincoln, Martin Luther King, Dorothy Day and Thomas Merton.
                This year marks the one hundred and fiftieth anniversary of the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln, the guardian of liberty, who labored tirelessly that “this nation, under God, [might] have a new birth of freedom”.  Building a future of freedom requires love of the common good and cooperation in a spirit of subsidiarity and solidarity.
                All of us are quite aware of, and deeply worried by, the disturbing social and political situation of the world today.  Our world is increasingly a place of violent conflict, hatred and brutal atrocities, committed even in the name of God and of religion.  We know that no religion is immune from forms of individual delusion or ideological extremism.  This means that we must be especially attentive to every type of fundamentalism, whether religious or of any other kind.  A delicate balance is required to combat violence perpetrated in the name of a religion, an ideology or an economic system, while also safeguarding religious freedom, intellectual freedom and individual freedoms.  But there is another temptation which we must especially guard against: the simplistic reductionism which sees only good or evil; or, if you will, the righteous and sinners.  The contemporary world, with its open wounds which affect so many of our brothers and sisters, demands that we confront every form of polarization which would divide it into these two camps.  We know that in the attempt to be freed of the enemy without, we can be tempted to feed the enemy within.  To imitate the hatred and violence of tyrants and murderers is the best way to take their place.  That is something which you, as a people, reject.
                Our response must instead be one of hope and healing, of peace and justice.  We are asked to summon the courage and the intelligence to resolve today’s many geopolitical and economic crises.  Even in the developed world, the effects of unjust structures and actions are all too apparent.  Our efforts must aim at restoring hope, righting wrongs, maintaining commitments, and thus promoting the well-being of individuals and of peoples.  We must move forward together, as one, in a renewed spirit of fraternity and solidarity, cooperating generously for the common good.
                The challenges facing us today call for a renewal of that spirit of cooperation, which has accomplished so much good throughout the history of the United States.  The complexity, the gravity and the urgency of these challenges demand that we pool our resources and talents, and resolve to support one another, with respect for our differences and our convictions of conscience.
                In this land, the various religious denominations have greatly contributed to building and strengthening society.  It is important that today, as in the past, the voice of faith continue to be heard, for it is a voice of fraternity and love, which tries to bring out the best in each person and in each society.  Such cooperation is a powerful resource in the battle to eliminate new global forms of slavery, born of grave injustices which can be overcome only through new policies and new forms of social consensus.
                Here I think of the political history of the United States, where democracy is deeply rooted in the mind of the American people.  All political activity must serve and promote the good of the human person and be based on respect for his or her dignity.  “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” (Declaration of Independence, 4 July 1776).  If politics must truly be at the service of the human person, it follows that it cannot be a slave to the economy and finance.  Politics is, instead, an expression of our compelling need to live as one, in order to build as one the greatest common good: that of a community which sacrifices particular interests in order to share, in justice and peace, its goods, its interests, its social life.  I do not underestimate the difficulty that this involves, but I encourage you in this effort.
                Here too I think of the march which Martin Luther King led from Selma to Montgomery fifty years ago as part of the campaign to fulfill his “dream” of full civil and political rights for African Americans.  That dream continues to inspire us all.  I am happy that America continues to be, for many, a land of “dreams”.  Dreams which lead to action, to participation, to commitment.  Dreams which awaken what is deepest and truest in the life of a people.
                In recent centuries, millions of people came to this land to pursue their dream of building a future in freedom.  We, the people of this continent, are not fearful of foreigners, because most of us were once foreigners.  I say this to you as the son of immigrants, knowing that so many of you are also descended from immigrants.  Tragically, the rights of those who were here long before us were not always respected.  For those peoples and their nations, from the heart of American democracy, I wish to reaffirm my highest esteem and appreciation.  Those first contacts were often turbulent and violent, but it is difficult to judge the past by the criteria of the present.  Nonetheless, when the stranger in our midst appeals to us, we must not repeat the sins and the errors of the past.  We must resolve now to live as nobly and as justly as possible, as we educate new generations not to turn their back on our “neighbors” and everything around us.  Building a nation calls us to recognize that we must constantly relate to others, rejecting a mindset of hostility in order to adopt one of reciprocal subsidiarity, in a constant effort to do our best.  I am confident that we can do this.
                Our world is facing a refugee crisis of a magnitude not seen since the Second World War.  This presents us with great challenges and many hard decisions.  On this continent, too, thousands of persons are led to travel north in search of a better life for themselves and for their loved ones, in search of greater opportunities.  Is this not what we want for our own children?  We must not be taken aback by their numbers, but rather view them as persons, seeing their faces and listening to their stories, trying to respond as best we can to their situation.  To respond in a way which is always humane, just and fraternal.  We need to avoid a common temptation nowadays: to discard whatever proves troublesome.  Let us remember the Golden Rule: “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” (Mt 7:12).
                This Rule points us in a clear direction.  Let us treat others with the same passion and compassion with which we want to be treated.  Let us seek for others the same possibilities which we seek for ourselves.  Let us help others to grow, as we would like to be helped ourselves.  In a word, if we want security, let us give security; if we want life, let us give life; if we want opportunities, let us provide opportunities.  The yardstick we use for others will be the yardstick which time will use for us.  The Golden Rule also reminds us of our responsibility to protect and defend human life at every stage of its development.
                This conviction has led me, from the beginning of my ministry, to advocate at different levels for the global abolition of the death penalty.  I am convinced that this way is the best, since every life is sacred, every human person is endowed with an inalienable dignity, and society can only benefit from the rehabilitation of those convicted of crimes.  Recently my brother bishops here in the United States renewed their call for the abolition of the death penalty.  Not only do I support them, but I also offer encouragement to all those who are convinced that a just and necessary punishment must never exclude the dimension of hope and the goal of rehabilitation.
                In these times when social concerns are so important, I cannot fail to mention the Servant of God Dorothy Day, who founded the Catholic Worker Movement.  Her social activism, her passion for justice and for the cause of the oppressed, were inspired by the Gospel, her faith, and the example of the saints.
                How much progress has been made in this area in so many parts of the world!  How much has been done in these first years of the third millennium to raise people out of extreme poverty!  I know that you share my conviction that much more still needs to be done, and that in times of crisis and economic hardship a spirit of global solidarity must not be lost.  At the same time I would encourage you to keep in mind all those people around us who are trapped in a cycle of poverty.  They too need to be given hope.  The fight against poverty and hunger must be fought constantly and on many fronts, especially in its causes.  I know that many Americans today, as in the past, are working to deal with this problem.
                It goes without saying that part of this great effort is the creation and distribution of wealth.  The right use of natural resources, the proper application of technology and the harnessing of the spirit of enterprise are essential elements of an economy which seeks to be modern, inclusive and sustainable.  “Business is a noble vocation, directed to producing wealth and improving the world.  It can be a fruitful source of prosperity for the area in which it operates, especially if it sees the creation of jobs as an essential part of its service to the common good” (Laudato Si’, 129).  This common good also includes the earth, a central theme of the encyclical which I recently wrote in order to “enter into dialogue with all people about our common home” (ibid., 3).  “We need a conversation which includes everyone, since the environmental challenge we are undergoing, and its human roots, concern and affect us all” (ibid., 14).
                In Laudato Si’, I call for a courageous and responsible effort to “redirect our steps” (ibid., 61), and to avert the most serious effects of the environmental deterioration caused by human activity.  I am convinced that we can make a difference, I'm sure and I have no doubt that the United States – and this Congress – have an important role to play.  Now is the time for courageous actions and strategies, aimed at implementing a “culture of care” (ibid., 231) and “an integrated approach to combating poverty, restoring dignity to the excluded, and at the same time protecting nature” (ibid., 139).  “We have the freedom needed to limit and direct technology” (ibid., 112); “to devise intelligent ways of… developing and limiting our power” (ibid., 78); and to put technology “at the service of another type of progress, one which is healthier, more human, more social, more integral” (ibid., 112).  In this regard, I am confident that America’s outstanding academic and research institutions can make a vital contribution in the years ahead.
                A century ago, at the beginning of the Great War, which Pope Benedict XV termed a “pointless slaughter”, another notable American was born: the Cistercian monk Thomas Merton.  He remains a source of spiritual inspiration and a guide for many people.  In his autobiography he wrote: “I came into the world.  Free by nature, in the image of God, I was nevertheless the prisoner of my own violence and my own selfishness, in the image of the world into which I was born.  That world was the picture of Hell, full of men like myself, loving God, and yet hating him; born to love him, living instead in fear of hopeless self-contradictory hungers”.  Merton was above all a man of prayer, a thinker who challenged the certitudes of his time and opened new horizons for souls and for the Church.  He was also a man of dialogue, a promoter of peace between peoples and religions.
                From this perspective of dialogue, I would like to recognize the efforts made in recent months to help overcome historic differences linked to painful episodes of the past.  It is my duty to build bridges and to help all men and women, in any way possible, to do the same.  When countries which have been at odds resume the path of dialogue – a dialogue which may have been interrupted for the most legitimate of reasons – new opportunities open up for all.  This has required, and requires, courage and daring, which is not the same as irresponsibility.  A good political leader is one who, with the interests of all in mind, seizes the moment in a spirit of openness and pragmatism.  A good political leader always opts to initiate processes rather than possessing spaces (cf. Evangelii Gaudium, 222-223).
                Being at the service of dialogue and peace also means being truly determined to minimize and, in the long term, to end the many armed conflicts throughout our world.  Here we have to ask ourselves: Why are deadly weapons being sold to those who plan to inflict untold suffering on individuals and society?  Sadly, the answer, as we all know, is simply for money: money that is drenched in blood, often innocent blood.  In the face of this shameful and culpable silence, it is our duty to confront the problem and to stop the arms trade.
                Three sons and a daughter of this land, four individuals and four dreams: Lincoln, liberty; Martin Luther King, liberty in plurality and non-exclusion; Dorothy Day, social justice and the rights of persons; and Thomas Merton, the capacity for dialogue and openness to God.
                Four representatives of the American people.

             I will end my visit to your country in Philadelphia, where I will take part in the World Meeting of Families.  It is my wish that throughout my visit the family should be a recurrent theme.  How essential the family has been to the building of this country!  And how worthy it remains of our support and encouragement!  Yet I cannot hide my concern for the family, which is threatened, perhaps as never before, from within and without.  Fundamental relationships are being called into question, as is the very basis of marriage and the family.  I can only reiterate the importance and, above all, the richness and the beauty of family life.
                In particular, I would like to call attention to those family members who are the most vulnerable, the young.  For many of them, a future filled with countless possibilities beckons, yet so many others seem disoriented and aimless, trapped in a hopeless maze of violence, abuse and despair.  Their problems are our problems.  We cannot avoid them.  We need to face them together, to talk about them and to seek effective solutions rather than getting bogged down in discussions.  At the risk of oversimplifying, we might say that we live in a culture which pressures young people not to start a family, because they lack possibilities for the future.  Yet this same culture presents others with so many options that they too are dissuaded from starting a family.
                A nation can be considered great when it defends liberty as Lincoln did, when it fosters a culture which enables people to “dream” of full rights for all their brothers and sisters, as Martin Luther King sought to do; when it strives for justice and the cause of the oppressed, as Dorothy Day did by her tireless work, the fruit of a faith which becomes dialogue and sows peace in the contemplative style of Thomas Merton.
                In these remarks I have sought to present some of the richness of your cultural heritage, of the spirit of the American people.  It is my desire that this spirit continue to develop and grow, so that as many young people as possible can inherit and dwell in a land which has inspired so many people to dream. 
              

  God bless America!

Source: Vatican Radio


The Blogger  is glad to have the great Servant of God Pope Francis as the guest speaker @ this blog 

Sunday 15 March 2015

Zimbabwe‘s Political Environment a Major Hindrance to Development Effectiveness


As highlighted in various Regional and International agreements and initiatives, development effectiveness is attained based on various key pillars, among them, country commitment   (political will), availability and efficient use of resources (human and capital) and cooperation in doing business (trade).
Zimbabwe as a developing country had vast of potential since its independence in 1980 from the colonial rule. It is sad to note that Zimbabwe was once a bread basket of Africa, ironically it has turned to be a basket case.

The victory that brought Zimbabwe to a new dispensation of independence was pinnacled with hope of a better and a sustainable economy. The emergency from an environment epitomized by suppression in form of colonialism gave Zimbabwe a clean slate to do better in national development.

It is however important to hail the immediate post independence era in which policy formulation was directed towards critical economic issues such education for all, eradication of poverty, employment, consolidation of good foreign policy and regional integration. The post independence era ushered with it names such as the Bread Basket of Africa among other ululations directed towards the economic strides that emanated from a promising economy. 

The 1990s was characterized by various happenings that shaped the events, among them the adoption of Economic Adjustments Programs, the troubles brought by the Land Reform Program, the rise of the opposition party Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), and the gradual collapse of the economy due to reduced agricultural activity and compensation payouts to War Veterans and increasing isolation by the International Community due to cited governance and human rights issues.

To investigate the previously mentioned points, Zimbabwe political environment plaid a major role in crippling its glamor towards effective development. Amidst a challenging domestic and international environment, the Zimbabwean government has faced numerous challenges in implementing the country’s development agenda.

The politicians enacted unfavorable policies that limited foreign direct investment. The Zimbabwe Indigenization Policy was said to be at the center of government to acquire sustainable growth. However, the policy has been criticized for lack of clarity and its vampire nature that scare away foreign direct investment (FDI). The policy compels foreign owned firms with a minimum capital of $ 500,000 to cede 51 percent of the shares to locals.
Apart from policies, since year 2000 the ruling party ZANU PF has been accused of political violence and gross human rights violations, especially towards national elections, this has contributed to the increased isolation. The International community in the likes of European Union and USA imposed sanctions in Zimbabwe.

As noted in the Report on Global Process of Development Effectiveness (2014), the Western countries partnered in efforts to mount pressure on Zimbabwe to improve the political, human rights and governance state within the country. The United States promulgated the punitive Zimbabwe Democracy and Economic Recovery Act (ZIDERA) in 2001, to curtail development aid and impose sanctions against the country. Western donor nations and organizations similarly halted economic aid to and investment in Zimbabwe. In October 2000, for example, the World Bank announced that it would extend no more loans to Zimbabwe.

Similarly, in 2002 the EU imposed restrictive measures on Zimbabwe through targeted sanctions, travel bans and arms embargo under Article 96 of the Cotonou Agreement. The country was not able to access capital in the form of direct overseas development assistance, foreign direct investment or cheap international credit, which deepened crisis. Confronted with these numerous challenges, Zimbabwe adopted the Look East Policy (LEP) by focusing on China, indigenization and black empowerment policies. China, guided by pragmatic realism, embraced the LEP, stepping in to fill the gap left by the West.

 As the Government of National Unity ended in 2013, the ruling party has assumed government and in the past year has been faced with internal factionalism that has seen a series of events which threaten development effectiveness and international relations. As cited in the Zimbabwe, Country Report on Global Process of Development Effectiveness (2014), the parliamentarians who received support in their communities for development projects from the American Embassy under the Ambassadors Special Grants Program are being fingered as sell-outs an part of a complex conspiracy for regime change.
The report further stipulated that, political violence has since re-surfaced. With corruption scandals besetting the ruling party, allegations abound of the involvement of Western countries in a supposed plot to assassinate the President while removing individuals that were seen as conservative and moderate. The political in-fighting has further divided an already polarized country and CSO engagements with government at national and local levels are increasingly seen and labelled as tantamount to implementing Western interests.

The official discourse on aid is embedded in the socio-economic and political history of the country which has triggered key events over the years.

The relationship between most aid agencies and the government has been very volatile, with aid agencies criticized for meddling in local politics and being drivers of the regime change agenda.

In this vein aid agencies have been viewed by the state as largely representing the interests of their donor countries rather than being genuinely philanthropic and are treated with suspicion.

It is against such a background that in 2002, the government suspended operations of several aid agencies. Since then, relations between the International aid community and the government of Zimbabwe have been characterized by mistrust. It has been observed that there is a general misconception about aid in Zimbabwe where most politicians see aid as an end in itself rather than a means to an end, with the end being poverty alleviation and socio-economic development.

To this end, Official Development Assistance (ODA) in Zimbabwe is fraught with lack of transparency, making it highly vulnerable to corruption by politicians who use it for their own vested interests like gaining political mileage at the expense of national development interests. 
At the Second High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness (2005) it was recognised that aid can be a vehicle to produce high impacts. The Paris Declaration was endorsed in order to base development efforts on first-hand experience of what works and does not work with aid. It is formulated around five central pillars:  Ownership, Alignment, Harmonisation, and Managing for Results and Mutual Accountability.

The year 2008 saw the Third High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness an even greater number and wider diversity of stakeholders endorsed the Accra Agenda for Action (AAA). The AAA both reaffirms commitment to the Paris Declaration and calls for greater partnership between different parties working on aid and development. In this regard, Zimbabwe continues to isolate itself through patronage politics.

The political instability attributed to the hovering of 146 % of GDP in external debt, the current external debt is estimated to be 10.7 billion. Zimbabwe’s domestic debt stood at $1,171 billion as of November 27, 2014 when Finance Minister Patrick Chinamasa announced his 2015 budget, with $264 million of that being in Treasury Bills issued mostly to banks and cash-rich companies for budget cash flow support.  Sadly, 75 percent of the 2015 National budget which is pegged at $ 4 billion is gobbled by the pubic service wage bill at the expense of capital projects in form of infrastructure development.

Apart from the challenges being faced by Zimbabwe in development effectiveness agenda, there is room for improvement and claim the lost status, this can be done by ensuring a political environment that is conducive for investment, address policy inconsistency, ensuring the respect of human rights and the rule of law, collaborating with CSOs and International partners for the causes of poverty alleviation among other.


Notes:  CSO contribution to the Global Process of Development Effectiveness: The Zimbabwean Context (NAYO, 2014)

OECDE, Better Policies for Better Lives, http://www.oecd.org

Misheck Gondo is a Policy and International Relations Expert. He is the  Regional Youth Coordinator for SADC-AAYC.

Friday 20 February 2015

Intensive Care Politics; the Sad Story of Opposition Politics in Zimbabwe



Since independence we have had some brave cadres who defied against the status quo of a one Party State, the likes of the late Edgar Toboy Tekere need to continue to be accorded a golden-medalististic recognition in the history of opposition politics in Zimbabwe. The mere fact that ZUM was brave enough to rise and challenge a lion in the name of Gushungo and his party ZANU PF is alone an eloquent statement adequate to lay the argument. 

 Misheck Gondo

The quest and hunger for democracy from 1999 led to other brave cadres in the name of MDC to launch an  opposition stance against a hegemonic rule. The MDC attracted the support of the grass roots and the western countries both in funding and principle, though the western countries where there to protect their foreign interests and policies especially after the much queried fast track land reform which was done haphazardly to counter the emergency of vibrant opposition party.

 MDC faced its problems, quick to mention the split that brought the other MDCs. It also had the chance to test the echelons of state leadership in the name of GNU, no doubt that the economy which was already on its knees and sink into oblivion due several governance factors was saved when the Tsvangirai led party agreed to join forces with the Revolution Party, this has to-in every mind of a Zimbabwean be hailed as it saved not only lives but also souls.

The GNU era should be remembered as a precise time to judge the type of opposition leaders we have in the country, given the chance to rule, power corrupt them absolutely, they are overwhelmed by power, they relax and drink opponent‘s strategies, swallowed, docile, forgetting the long time agenda of change, made to endorse several positions that go against their much touted agenda.

The birth of Mavambo Kusile Dawn was such a marveled idea which was received with mixed feelings, following Simba‘s mirroristic bravery such as that of Tekere from ZANU PF, the learned gentlemen claimed he was the solution bearer to myriad of challenges facing Zimbabwe, with big wings such as Dumiso Dabengwa a ZAPU cadre, it was not doubtable that a lot of big wings comrades from ZANU PF were to follow his political ideology, only to realize that he was almost alone.

A plethora of theories are emerging which are meant to destabilize ZANU PF from its 34 years of dictatorship. The theories are posited to bring a desired change. 

In this Change Theory, not to be out done is the emergency of a very learned collogue , a Professor par excellence, Lovemore Madhuku who turned a constitution monitoring body to a political Party,(NCA) and it is believed he is still strategizing in hiding.

It is legally correct to say, Zimbabwe is a Multi-Party democracy, whoever feels to represent the people will be accorded the opportunity to do so, constitutionally. The Toungana’s, the Shake’s, the Ncube’s, the Biti’s among other cadres who have come and gone, tried and are still trying their best in quest for democracy, but the question remains, are they focused and serious.

The split of a 15-year-old movement which has so far presented President Robert Mugabe and Zanu PF with the stiffest challenge since independence in 1980 has weakened the opposition fortunes to power. 

Failure to solve problems, failure to follow their own democratic guidelines, lack of coherent futuristic frameworks,  infiltration among other, are the major cited issues that have destabilized and derailed the train to Canaan.

It’s sad noting that, most of the comrades in the opposition matrix have been celebrating the conflicts in ZANU PF instead of capitalizing, re-strategizing and take advantage of that process.

 Zimbabweans have been through a long time political training and are fed up with political rhetoric; instead, they want to see organized frameworks that bring results, actions that counter discovered mistakes and leadership that walks with people both in spirit and principles.

The current opposition parties have derailed from their founding norms of democracy, rule of law, pro-poor planning among others, they are comfortably sectioning in the play field of individualistic politics, name calling, power consolidation, black mailing which is an epitomization  of 10th century politics.

Instead of planning for change, a lot of power is diverted against each other in the democratic front, a shame scenario in the growth of our Zimba-Politics. 

As the survey by Zimbabwe Democracy Institute (ZDI), it states that the opposition is currently deeply fractured and this might prove fatal to the overwhelming need to vote out the Zanu PF dictatorship; even in the event that a free and fair election is held in the country. ZDI postulated that, there is dire need for all democratic forces to forge alliance against ZANU PF, if there is to be a change any time soon.

With the ugly face currently exhibited by once a beautiful Opposition Movement of the new millennium, one will wonder if ZDI advice will go through, given the rate of mistrust, jostling for positions, pride, and individualistic-malistic behavior enshrined in our beloved opposition leaders ‘s hearts.

All the same, to come out of this political comatose, the opposition need to self-introspect, re-strategize in a manner that is beneficial to Zimbabwe, realizing that the art of opposition in any given country strengthens development and good governance, its not just a mere-shire piece of self-development -of  acquiring fame and prosperity.

There is that chance for the opposition to change, there is also an equal chance for ZANU-PF, the ruling party to transform itself into a democratic movement, apologize for its wrongs, with an added advantage of the liberation struggle; start afresh guided by the rule of law. 

Even through, the country still needs a vibrant, organized, dedicated, home grown opposition party that keeps checks and balance and have the capacity to govern whenever it wins elections.

Let’s wait and see!

Misheck Gondo is a Political Analyst